350
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 136 points 1 month ago

Hopefully I don't get many downvotes for this, but it isns't necessary to deny anything related to AI and bombard Mozilla for this. Sure, Copilot is a disaster, because it is a service and will call home to M$ and collect your data. But all of what Mozilla offers us is on-device AI, which is exceptional. I've been waiting so long for on-device AI-based webpage translation, so people don't need to rely on external services like Google or Bing to translate any more.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago

Yeah, Mozilla is doing good work, and AI is here to stay. It's all about making and using AI ethically.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Same, their local translation tech is absolutely great! If they keep working "AI" features that are pretty much quality of life ML stuff I'm all in for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 112 points 1 month ago

We are approaching the use of AI in Firefox — which many, many of you have been asking about

Which one of you was it, who asked for AI in Firefox???

[-] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago

It looks like they are riding the AI wave to bring more features that are just good, local ML-based, and I'm all in for it. Firefox Translation is a great recent example, it's good.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

AI actually can be very good at translating things locally while keeping tone and intent, and thats what mozilla mentions here. I'm fully down with AI powered local translation tools native to firefox, it'll put it way above the competition

Some LLMs are low enough in resource usage to do this on weak and older PCs

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 weeks ago

when used to enhance accessibility? me. especially in this case where it's used for better alt text and descriptive text in pdfs, a tech that has long struggled with that.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

It's a useful technology. Would be stupid to ignore it

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Board of directors, I guess.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

The chatbots, presumably.

[-] [email protected] 73 points 1 month ago

Can’t wait for vertical tabs

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Vertical slabs

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] [email protected] 56 points 1 month ago

"At Mozilla, we work hard to make Firefox the best browser for you. That’s why we’re always focused on building a browser.."

You don't need to lie to us. We are just happy you are finally working on browser features.

I'm looking forward to reducing ui clutter and profile improvements.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

I only need Firefox to load pages faster than Chrome

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago

Good luck convincing people to switch to it based only on "it loads pages faster than Chrome" though. It's a good goal to have, but getting tunnel-visioned on it when their current speed in real world use is pretty comparable is definitely not a good long-term plan.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 4 weeks ago

Soon, Firefox can block ads better than Chrome. Ads are annoying. I see Chrome losing at least a 5% of the market, if not more, to Firefox, just because they're going to break uBlock Origin, and Firefox isn't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

I'm not talking about pulling more people. I'm talking about my issue as an existing and looooong term user of Firefox. I started using a very low end phone recently, and Firefox vs Chrome on it is night and day difference. I don't notice it on my galaxy phone, but on low end devices it's torturous.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Oh, you mean FF for Android? Yeah, on that front it really needs a ton of work. On the desktop side things are pretty much fast to a point where in real world use the difference is minimal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

Tab Grouping would be great if implented well.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

kinda excited to see what their native vertical tabs will look like. i’ve been using sidebery for the past ~3 years and i’m extremely satisfied with it, i somehow doubt their native version will look as good

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Same but for tab groups. I can't believe it took this long and every extension-based alternative is busted in some fundamental way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago

Holy shit, it is. I'm really hoping that includes mobile, since it's the only thing keeping me using a Chromium browser

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Pretty please, fuck off with the AI. It's really not something I need from a browser, don't inflate your download size for a screen reader, just MAKE IT OPTIONAL in every way.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago

I totally agree regarding making it optional, but I have to say the idea of auto generating alt texts sounds like a really useful application of AI - no one really likes to do that manually yet a significant number of beautiful people rely on it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just want HDR video support

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

There's a lot of doom and gloom online about this, but to me these seem like welcome changes 🤷

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This has actually been the most positive reaction to a Firefox announcement I've seen in a long time. I've yet to find a piece of open source software users act more toxic towards than Firefox. It is impossible to find any Firefox-related announcement in recent years that's received broadly positive feedback. For a long time, the top voted comment would always be someone demanding tab groups or vertical tabs. Now they're adding those, which is probably why the reaction has been a bit more positive. But of course, AI and UI changes have become the new things to complain about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago

Finally, the only two features I've been missing - tab groups and profiles. With all the modern internet browser stones, we'll be unstoppable!

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

More streamlined menus that reduce visual clutter and prioritize top user actions so you can get to the important things quicker.

So make things even harder to find? A classic menu bar is not clutter!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Reading pages out loud has been an unexpected hit for me on the latest iOS. I’d love this in Firefox too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
350 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

45417 readers
2011 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS