SenorBolsa

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

How do I get a computer? My neighbors do not make computers. The next 100 towns over don't either. (at least not in whole) Do I go to the computer people in taiwan with a bunch of stuff the engineers and manufacturing technicians need? How much time would I have to spend to do that? Wouldn't it be nice if we agreed on a medium of exchange that represented my labor, fair share, or value to society that I could just send electronically and could be exchanged again locally for what they need specifically?

It sure is the way we lived naturally in small tribes, but that's not tenable at a certain point and it's why almost every society that has grown to a sufficient size to make good use of it has invented some form of currency.

Money isn't the problem, it's the way it's used.

Also society is so large there's no way to have that level of accountability for everyone unless you create some neofascist social credit system.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Uncontacted tribes also don't have advanced medicine (though not to say they haven't discovered a great deal of important things on their own) or well... videogames. If you want to live like that more power to you, but for all the faults of modern society it has massive benefits as well.

I think there's plenty of middle ground to be found where we can have our cake and eat it too even if it looks wildly different from what we have now. Gift economies just don't work when you have billions of people involved. It's ultimately more efficient to give people money and then they can spend it on what they need or want. Even the idea of a corporation or company isn't inherently broken, people will always have a need to organize themselves to create efficiencies and build bigger things than they could on their own.

Capitalism is shit, the concept of money, and organized labor, is quite good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The later ones don't allow that, they'll just take off and you'll have to reset. Some mods let you turn it off but really the game just becomes a cakewalk if you do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yup and why they come flying up your ass when you are ahead. It's usually mostly in the computers favor lol.

Earl is the worst for this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

lowering foliage draw distance, LODs, Volumetrics, particles, crowd density etc. does lower your draw calls though.

Yeah, the series X has a faster GPU that can take advantage of the slightly higher clocks for higher framerates or additional detail/objects.

Practically speaking that 6% makes no difference whatsoever in terms of whether or not you can do something. Maybe the series S drops a few frames below it's target when something intense happens, that's going to be about it.

The memory bandwidth is shockingly halved with 2GB of it running at 1/10 the bandwidth of the X though, I see that being a huge issue in many titles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Just unlucky, I've played through the game many times and some runs I get none other runs I get a lot. There is a pattern to some of them, but if you are just picking yourself it's truly random, there's no "loaded dice" system involved to throw the player a bone. (though you'd think there would be with how aggressive catchup is XD)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

it's actually 200mhz (had to fact check that) a 6% difference, which is surely made up by not having as many draw calls to do and hardly anyone has that as their fundamental limit anyways, when a game runs at 60fps (or more) on the X and 30 (or 60) on the S there's clearly a ton of headroom. Almost all games on these systems are certain to be GPU limited on the Series S.

The memory is a significant enough difference to matter though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's just different, I don't know as I've gotten older the "edginess" of the older titles doesn't really hit with me anyways so I didn't miss it at all and I felt it was replaced with a more modern take on the idea. They did some really fun stuff with it, for example there's a set of missions where you go LARPing all over the map with dart guns in a kind of weird mix of mad max and high fantasy. I didn't like the characters in the crew at first either but they grow on you I don't think the gang in the other games was any less corny or goofy these ones are just more modern takes.

I think edginess had it's time, but it's old hat now. It still feels every bit a madcap gang adventure a Saints game should be. I wouldn't spend $60 on it, but for $20 it's a winner all day if you just want a dumb fun game. There's plenty to do and plenty of actually new gameplay changing things to discover and unlock. Clearing out gangs feels a bit repetitive, but not much different from something like Far Cry 3/4/5/6

Maybe it's not your thing, and I think it's probably fair to level the critique that it's not what the hardcore fans really wanted, but I don't think the game fails to deliver a good experience overall especially now that it's all bugfixed etc. (which it was shortly after launch but still that launch sucked a little)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

The CPU is only 100mhz slower and identical in every other respect so it really is good enough to be considered the same. But yes I suppose memory bandwidth and size can be an issue downporting games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My buddy even produced a 60second live action ad for them that got axed over the "drama". People act like all the other games were masterpieces somehow. I'd still also love to see a remaster of the first two games but that's neither here nor there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

It's a pretty decent game, I still don't understand why everyone was so down on it. I had a lot of fun playing it, there was decent variety, the gunplay was good, and the silly storylines were entertaining.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Also fab production is a fundamental limitation to a greater degree than it was in the past, prices typically fell quickly as a process node gained better yields and could be made on less busy production lines but you have a much higher fixed cost just to convince TSMC or whoever to put you high enough up in priority to get your wafers made at all.

view more: ‹ prev next ›