Yeah, I would think memory as well due to the screen artifacts in that low res mode. (That depends on how x86 memory is mapped these days, I suppose.)
remotelove
joined 10 months ago
Mr. Peanut approved.
Ultimately you need only a tiny fraction of that data to emulate the human brain.
I am curious how that conclusion was formed as we have only recently discovered many new types of functional brain cells.
While I am not saying this is the case, that statement sounds like it was based on the "we only use 10% of our brain" myth, so that is why I am trying to get clarification.
Your comment formed a perfect pressure waveform.
piece in the pic is just found on the floor
This checks out. Even with all of my storage and shelving, I have found the floor to be a nice place to go parts shopping. JST bits are at the top of the list to find, usually. (What was that? You never bought any? You'll find some, don't worry.)
Do you need a bit of wire to patch a trace? Take your shoes off and walk around a bit and you will immediately find a lead you clipped off a through-hole component in about 15 seconds, even though you vacuumed 6 times since you lost it.
My As licking days are over, it seems. That's what I got out of this.
Oxygen is a beast.
O wants to join with everything so bad, it sticks to itself first. O2 is still hungry enough to spontaneously eat iron. O3 can start breaking down some plastics and is extremely effective at sterilization.
Oxygen is extremely underrated and is the honey badger of all the elements.
I still can't believe that bullshit commercial. Alcohol is magnitudes worse than some of the most common recreational drugs. Psychedelics even encourage brain cell development, for fucks sake.
It's taken almost 2 years for my brain to recover after stopping the booze. It's absolutely amazing how much better I can perform complex tasks and form sentences. (I only recently started noticing how much, actually.)
What is the comparison here? If both objects are in cold and dry conditions, I wouldn't expect any less.
If they had unwrapped the cigarette butt to expose the filter, it might have been a better representation of their point?
Maybe it's just a promotional cigarette ad for frogs? Math problem? frog + cigarette = frogarette? Yeah... I dunno.
No, not poisonous. It's the about the quantity and quality. Large quantities of the cheapest vodka you can get usually means that you are a hardcore alcoholic or you are on a serious mission to get as blasted as you possibly can in as short of a time as you can.
Not many people but large jugs of cheap vodka because they like the taste. (Some do, though.)
This guy was the real killer. The new RMcD is just the cover story.