this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
1644 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26182 readers
3045 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 277 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It seems like a flavour of the rubber duck method; by trying to explain it to a third party, you think about it in a different way and find a solution.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Never heard the term but I often do it intuitively

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Trust me bro(ette): Rubber duck is the SHIT. I don't even program save for a few rare instances, but any complex issue where you just know something is wrong but can't quite put your finger on it? It works miracles. A lot better tbf if you are actually explaining it to someone who can ask questions, but any object that you can look at is a good substitute.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

My cat is my rubber duck. I get some weird looks from her.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Initially I thought this comment was threaded under the "my cat is my rubber duck" comment which made it much worse.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Hey, pal - that's my mom you're talking about

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The rubber duck method is just another flavor of thinking out loud.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I think it's a bit more than that. I think that the idea is that you simplify the problem so that the rubber duck could understand it. Or at least reformulate it in order to communicate it clearly.

It's the simplification, reformulation or reorganisation that helps to get the breakthrough.

Just thinking out loud isn't quite the same thing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even though this is true for like 90% of my thinking (that I can see when I try), so far I'm concinced this ist because I am a predominantly language-and-normal-grammar-rules thinker.

There are people that mostly think via associations of words that don't have to be formulated/ cast into grammar.

And then there supposedly people mainly thinking in pictures or smth, without words.

Anyways for some people rubber duck mode reoresents a change in thinking method, I think

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI in general is only a glorified rubber duck for most cases. The amount of bullshit cobbled together is too high for many uses

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ai, the rolling coal of tought processes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe the real artificial intelligence is the regular intelligence we found along the way.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (5 children)

NOOOOOOOO BRO

YOU GOTTA TRY THIS AI I PUT IN MY DIGITAL ALARM CLOCK

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

There’s a reason cs50’s ai assistant/tutor is a duck :p

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And all we needed was the electricity of a good sized industrial nation state.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (6 children)

To be fair, I've written countless stack overflow posts detailing my problems in hope someone would be able to spot the mistake or error only for me to realize what it was along the way and never even submitting it.

And I didn't even need a 🦆 for it

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Education has really failed to impress upon people the importance of asking questions. It's amazing how much time is wasted on making people learn answers to questions they don't even know how to ask.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The most valuable tool I ever got (as a tutor/teacher) was Socratic Questioning. Students not only benefit from its application but it also helps to impress upon them the value (and relative skill) to asking thoughtful questions.

I don't mean to sound like a Mom for Liberty, but to my mind, the American public education system (probably others) is not about developing intelligence but rather preparing children for work and keeping them busy/safe while their parents work, and I'd argue it's not very good at its primary function. The ones who escape with curiosity, capacity, and confidence intact are woefully rare if you care about power to the people and thankfully rare if you care about keeping people easy to control.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, it's a well known technique in programming called "rubber duck debugging".

The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging.

But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It's weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is it just me or is this a really weird way of repeating what the OP said? He even used the duck emoji for clarity....

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

You needed a duck. You used one. It didn't really look like a duck but it served the same purpose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

99% of the questions I was going to post to stack overflow were solved before I hit post. Something about really having to think through your problem to give people the most complete information about your problem as possible makes it easier to find the solution.

I did just get a rubber ducky and I didn't know what I should do with it till now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i wanted to try this, but i only got a hard plastic duck

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

well that should work, unless you are the infamous reddit user, fuckswithducks, in which case it might also work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

nah, my reddit username was Unidan and i only fucked with crows

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's like how I cheated through every single test in school I've ever taken. I literally just paid attention to what the teacher said, wrote the answers down, wrote down more answers from the book, and then read them a couple times until I remembered them. I'd come in and just write down all those answers on the test and they'd never suspect a thing. I've still never been caught to this day and I even use it in my life outside of school.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Back in the days of usenet if I had a Linux problem I would carefully research the issue while composing a post asking how to solve it. I needed to make sure I covered every possible option so that people would know just how odd the problem was and that I had taken every reasonable step to fix it. And this was how I hardly ever had to post anything because this process almost always found the answer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

In programming we use a rubber ducky for this

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Yea I sometimes use LLM chatbots as a rubber duck.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Is anyone who uses AI just an "AI folk" now?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

People who are using it to solve problems which require equivalent effort of writing a sufficient prompt and just directly solving it without AI at all for sure are AI folk.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't have the equipment or cybernetics to have this title yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A problem well stated is a problem half-solved.

Charles Kettering

Charles Franklin Kettering (August 29, 1876 – November 25, 1958) sometimes known as Charles Fredrick Kettering[1] was an American inventor, engineer, businessman, and the holder of 186 patents.[2] He was a founder of Delco, and was head of research at General Motors from 1920 to 1947. Among his most widely used automotive developments were the electrical starting motor[3] and leaded gasoline.[4] In association with the DuPont Chemical Company, he was also responsible for the invention of Freon refrigerant for refrigeration and air conditioning systems. At DuPont he also was responsible for the development of Duco lacquers and enamels, the first practical colored paints for mass-produced automobiles. While working with the Dayton-Wright Company he developed the "Bug" aerial torpedo, considered the world's first aerial missile.[5] He led the advancement of practical, lightweight two-stroke diesel engines, revolutionizing the locomotive and heavy equipment industries. In 1927, he founded the Kettering Foundation, a non-partisan research foundation, and was featured on the cover of Time magazine in January 1933.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

"Correct question is half of answer"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

What a feature. Blueskyians really don’t like birdsite.

Also, hope somebody finds this comment (& Lemmy) via web search

Possible Twitter screenshot

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can't count the number of times I've written out a question for a coworker, answered it myself in the process of phrasing the question and deleted it all. My mentoree has a habit of sending me messages and deleting them a couple seconds later which I'm pretty sure is the same thing.

People can hate ai all they want but if bouncing questions off an ai helps debug a problem go for it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ineresting, will make a good topic for my next offline podcast (talking to my friends without a microphone).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What tech support department doesn't have the "ask the stuffed bear on the counter in the corner out loud your question before asking tech support" system in place ?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought the canonical examen was a rubber duck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Am I the only one that sees all of these AI platforms as just the next iteration of search engines?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're late lol. Phone assistants such as Siri, Bixby, Google Assistant etc. have already been AI search engines for years. People just didn't really consider it until it got more advanced but it's always been there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Doesn't have anything to do with AI. This is normal in any context where you're asking another party for help.

But sure, people who use AI have never considered thinking before /s

load more comments
view more: next ›