this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
-12 points (36.4% liked)

Open Source

28963 readers
631 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Genuinely trying to know if this is intentional to incorporate non-free open source software? If yes then why?

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm not the one who created this community, but I highly suspect that this community was named after the r/opensource sub on Reddit, like many other communites here. r/opensource has (or had) 200k users whereas r/foss only had 8k users, so I guess it was a natural choice to pick the more popular sub out of the two.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Who gives a shit. Read the sidebar.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't have a definitive answer to your first question, but why would we want to limit a sub to FOSS-only discussion? It's a more restrictive designation. By calling the sub "open source" we're keeping it open to software that isn't technically FOSS.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think a lot of people here actually mean foss when they say open source. Calling it foss might impart the right message and the importance of libre software to new folks. I am little conflicted about non-libre open source software as might be evident by now, maybe my bias is unjustified.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah the distinction is pretty small, and usually people are just talking about FOSS software....but I'd rather avoid the semantics so just calling the community "open source" makes sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Incorporate? Meh. People just can discuss all types of open source software here, not only free of charge, fully libre, etc..

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Opensource is a more used term compared to foss. So popularity wise it was chosen is my guess.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

It’s kinda the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software#Free_software

FOSS or FLOSS is more explicit, and Stalmann has a preference.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Wait until you see what the GNU/Linux sublemmy (lem?) is called.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Found the kbin user

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Linuxmasterrace?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

As @[email protected] commented, the official definitions of free software and Open Source actually overlap quite heavily; the concerns made by many - including Stallman/the FSF and even Bruce Perens (author of the Open Source Definition) - involve the belief that Open Source has detached from the values associated with the free software movement.

If you are in fact specifically addressing the fairly small subset of open-source-but-not-free software, I would guess that the overlap is great enough for it to not detract from discussions, and "open source" is simply more commonly used.

Just a note, I'm also pretty sure some people in the comments have mixed up free-as-in-libre software for free-as-in-beer software, which is why I prefer to say "libre" instead.