this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
421 points (96.5% liked)

RPGMemes

9717 readers
328 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Giving an unlimited resource always changes the balance, the most fun i ever had as a rouge was with limited arrows because it forced me to think outside the box of “hide and shoot”

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The Shadow of the Demon lord system is different and interesting. You don't track individual arrows, you track quivers (which are quite expensive). A character might have like 3 quivers.

You lose a quiver on a critical fail, otherwise you don't track ammo. This means on average you have 20 arrows per quiver, which works out about right without any of the paperwork.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Interesting but i don’t like it from a role playing angle. I don’t know how to explain how that works, but if i could it would be cool.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not a player myself, but would this work?

Each quiver holds a single arrow, but they are enchanted with a replenishment function. If the archer utters a specific phrase just after drawing, the arrow replenishes. If they miss the very tight window, the enchantment is broken and has to be re-applied.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

The way my gm does it is basically "Drawing and rapidly firing, you reach into your quiver and find it empty". This works because we've never had multiple crit fails in a row.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Your in game god of archery thought your form was so cringe that they zapped a quiver out of existence to save you the embarrassment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (15 children)

Would you like it if it werent counted then ?

Because being forced to do what you do not want or need to do is the problem.

No matter if its counted or not, pick whatever you prefer and is more fun to you. You can even have both at once in the same party.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Random story on bows:

One of the first DnD experiences I had I was told not to worry about counting arrows. We had an encounter down a long corridor where I had a particularly advantageous spot I could use my bow at. I got some great rolls, got sneak attack bonuses, and ultimately carried the entire encounter.

The party was happy, the DM was not. Next session, I had to count arrows, none of them could be recoverable as they 'always broke', the DM ruled they no longer got a sneak attack bonus, and every merchant in town was always 'fresh out' so I could never restock.

This was years ago and I still have never made another character with a bow.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

100%. If you as a DM get salty about the players using the tools given to them, you're a bad DM.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

Almost like if being limited into your main gimmick outside of the rulea or even fun factor is never good.

Fuck that DM

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

I would have dropped that campaign like a bad habit. That DM actively made your experience worse because you had a good session, and that's just not ok.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'll never understand why some DMs nerf players when they can just as easily buff themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

DM: "You all get a magic quiver with unlimited arrows. Hurray!"

The one player who spent all their money on fancy arrows of various kinds crumples their character sheet up and tosses it aside

Player: "I don't wanna play anymore... 😠"

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Regular arrows should be infinite and special arrows limited. I like how they did it in BG3 actuallu

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I haven't played 5E on paper so I was actually wondering if that's how the rules worked or not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Normally you count them and get half of the shot ones back. It sucks. Thats why almost nobody does it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Technically no. In reality, yes. Bows require arrows and most spells require a material component. These are never tracked unless it's something special. If a spell costs thousands of gold in material components to cast, it should be required that you actually aquire that component, but otherwise pretty much everyone just assumes that you are prepared with a enough basic materials. The same for arrows and any other basic resources usually. I've never played with a party that tracks food and water, for example. It's just assumed you've come prepared.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I hardly have players even using arrows in our 3.5 games, but I do definitely require the expensive material components (like I know there's a spell that requires a ruby with 100gp or more). Most of them can be acquired easily enough that it doesn't matter (such as sulphur + bat guano) but if it's expensive/rare enough, I'm going to make sure you can actually get them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

My players would just sell it back. I know, I gave them important items and they did that XD

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For me it was not being able to cast spell with sword and shield

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I started a Pathfinder CRPG a few days ago and one of the classes is specifically designed just to do that. I was tempted to choose it but it had like the highest class difficulty and it's my first time playing so I played it safe and just went with a regular ol' sorcerer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I played in one campaign where I had to track arrows. It was a homebrewed world where anything outside of cities was extremely dangerous. We found eventually that the reason why was all the good gods had died, as this devouring entity had started eating them and then had gotten trapped, which let evil go unchecked.

It was a lot of fun, my character would have to go out and sneak around to find good wood for arrows and he spent his time during watches crafting more arrows.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

So you liked it and had fun right ?

Good then. The question isnt to count arrows or not, but to find how to have fun yourself with the arrows. There isnt a right answer. It depends on you as a player.

If you have fun, you are winning. Doesnt matter if you count or not.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just did it counting arrows for a 5e dungeon campaign, and it makes things more interesting. 5E has turfed most of the original D&D dungeon crawl mechanics, but I can see why it was a thing - it adds a little bit of risk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I count special arrows, but normal ones ? Its not fun if you build your built around it. Plus, its very easy to carry hundreds of them at once, using your party as mules. Meaning the only moments you are lacking bolts or arrows is either your choice or your DM's. So, either you have fun yourself by adding a challenge, akind to me picking spells appropriate for my bard, or the DM's that wants to limit you in a bad way

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

So far the DM isn't being difficult. I feel like I should be able to carry a few dozen without penalty. We'll see how the game progresses.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Timer systems like arrow counting, rations and encumbrance are good for game flow. Removing them tends to diminish the level of emotional investment and roleplaying in the game.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Personally I've never managed to make 20 attacks as an archer in one combat in 5e before, so tracking those just tends to result in a number going from 20 to 12 or whatever and then me saying "by the way I walk around the battlefield picking up my arrows"

it doesn't really add anything

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What you described is barely a timer system, reset on combat end doesn't really ever matter to a game. I'm addressing longer time frame resource drain benefiting the game by creating risk and promoting choice. There isn't really a point if arrows aren't lost and broken.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean sure, I've dealt with GMs saying arrows broke or were lost or whatever. Now in the next combat that number on my character sheet counts down from 17 to 10. Then next combat it goes from 15 to 9. Then I get to a town and say "ok i go buy some arrows how much does that cost" and the gm says "idk like some silver" and im like "cool" and i remove a gold piece and refill arrows

it still doesn't really add anything

this isn't because those aspects of game design are fundamentally flawed, that isn't what im saying. just that 5e doesn't really work like that. it's not a very well designed system at the end of the day

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'd get overwhelmed very quickly trying to keep track of all that personally, but if it works for your table, that's perfectly fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I can only keep up with this things on vtt's, specially foundry.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

There are systems that make it not purely accounting, like resource dice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm a Shadowrun player and we even count the bullets in magazines

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I love pulling out protractors and doing trigonometry during my roleplay session to calculate bullet spin and drop

And doing all of that as a first step before rolling dice

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Measuring the exact weight of every item in inventory is also a charming but typically discouraged new player practice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I find this more fun in systems like Shadowrun where I can be like 'This mag is alternatively loaded with Exex and APDS ammo and it's for the big emergencies that sometimes happen'. Like, you might have 6 different mags with different ammo in that game and use them all, depending on what situations come up.

I really like Fabula Ultimas take on this too: Basic consumables like arrows aren't limited or tracked, but you have inventory points that inform how many potions or other situation-changing items you can produce out of your bag of tricks, before you need to hit a town to restock. And then they have some abilities/classes you can pick give you more of these points, refill these points in combat or during travel, or key off of these points to do other things related to crafting and item use. Really really good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Eating candy?

load more comments
view more: next ›